I just read an article about a soldier going
AWOL after being told he would have to return to Iraq and find myself angry. Yes, angry...not a feeling I typically claim. So, what am I angry about? I am angry that we do not allow for conscientious dissent or objectors to the war. I think of any war that we have had throughout history and many times we have seen a "good" and a "bad" side to it. One side is right and just, while the other is evil and wrong. First of all, is it that easy to categorize people and their belief structures? To label a whole race or country? Second, why should we be forced to fight for something we don't believe in? Aren't you then a prisoner of your own system, your own government? We seem to hail the military as a group that is fighting for our rights as Americans and forget that those who are fighting ultimately have no rights. They have no right to object, to NOT follow what they are told. Then, at times, when they do follow it, they are told they should not have followed certain orders. Look at Abu Ghraib prison "scandal." How many of those soldiers were possibly just following orders. What about Guantanamo Bay? You have to wonder how someone can allow abuses of other human beings and not be a little off their rocker. Okay, I know this probably upsets people because it seems unpatriotic, but as an American I have a right to have my own thoughts and opinions, and therefore live my life the way I see fit. Too bad we do not extend that right to our own soldiers.
Okay, I digress, back to my point about why I am angry. I think of WWII, probably the most publicized and understood war in our history. So, would we have blamed German soldiers who objected to Hitler's demands or orders? Would we have called them a hero? Would we have applauded them standing up for human decency, even in the face of possible persecution themselves? Yet, we cannot seem to extend such to our own soldiers? Hmm, seems wrong here. How can we take a pre-emptive strike against a country that we have no right to have invaded in the first place, then call it just? If we want to take some moral ground for what Saddam was doing to the people in that country, then why haven't we invaded Darfur instead? Aren't the atrocities happening in that country far worse than what Saddam ever did? The mass murdering of innocent men, women and children? In my opinion, we need to take a step back and really look at our own involvement in this Iraq war and take it the context of our wider involvement with other countries. If we are going to pretend to be the world's police, then shouldn't we show some discernment about what that looks like? Here people are in Iraq, some willing and wanting because they believe they are fighting for a cause. Some do not want to be there because they have objection to it...for whatever reason. For those who want to be there, I am sorry, but I feel our government has lied to them, their commanders have lied to them. How else could they get people to buy into fighting this war if they didn't tie it to "terrorism" and 9/11? Unfortunately what we are doing, as a result of our government's decision to go to war, is only creating chaos and more fuel for terrorists fight.
Right now there are many thoughts I have going through my head in light of the recent John Kerry remarks concerning our soldiers. I know my stance on that would not be a popular one. As someone who worked with the military, grew up in a military town, and married someone who was in the military, I would like to think that I have at least some insight, or at least enough perspective to form a relatively intelligent opinion about this whole mess. Truth be told that yes, many people wanted to join the military because they felt it was patriotic or the right thing to do. However, nobody should fool themselves into thinking that is true for everyone. I would venture to say that most people that join the military as NCOs is because they feel they have no other real options. They want an education and don't see another way for obtaining it; or they need some stability, which the socialist structure of the military offers; or they have a family they need to support and the benefits (meaning health care--although shoddy--etc.) are attractive. So, how do I know this? I used to ask every single person I taught in the military about why they joined. I also used to ask those I knew living in San Antonio. My own informal survey, but only a couple people throughout my years have first and foremost declared patriotism as the reason for joining. BTW, that is part of what the induction period of "basic training" instills in people. On another note, recruiters have to convince and lie many times by painting a rosy picture. Also, recently to meet recruitment numbers, all branches of the military have reduced the acceptable scores for people to join. If they told the truth, I think that people wouldn't join. I remember many new recruits regretting their decision and being stuck with it for four or five more years, based on their signing agreement. Now, because of the dwindling numbers of recruits, people are not allowed to leave when their time is up. They are then forced to continue to serve "their country." I put that in quotes because I see it as really serving a government that has their own agenda other than what is in the best interest of its citizens.
Okay, I have spent more time on this then intended. I do realize that people have family members or friends that might have a different perspective. My point exactly, there are many different perspectives and we cannot be a people who paints a picture as black and white. There are many derivations of gray. It is too complex a situation to put into a box, but I do believe this administration has done just that. To be against the war and this administration does not for me equate to being against the soldiers who are putting their lives on the line. I do think that if it were me over in Iraq, I would have to lie to myself and buy into some belief that what I was doing was okay, otherwise I would have to run or go crazy. So, are we a country that will allow for conscientious disserters or not? Apparently not.
Any comments, thoughts or even dissention, welcomed. This is a country of free speech, or so we say...and there is the invitation to disagee. I am willing to be influenced...